miércoles, 24 de diciembre de 2025

Stranger Things

 









Stranger Things 


Christmas in Hawkins: When the Leftovers Taste Like 'Stranger Things' and Late-Onset Puberty

By: A viewer with holiday indigestion

The scene is a holiday cliché: it’s December 25th, your stomach is at a breaking point from turkey and romeritos, and the whole family is slumped on the sofa in a food coma. No one wants to argue about politics, so we turn on the TV. And there it is, like a gift we asked for three years ago that finally arrived after being delayed by pandemics and Hollywood strikes: the premiere of the fifth and final season of Stranger Things.

Netflix doesn’t miss a beat. They know that during the holidays, we are easy prey for nostalgia and passive entertainment. So, between the punch and the dessert, we dive once more into Hawkins. But returning to this universe feels, from the start, like visiting those distant nephews you haven't seen since they wore braces—only now they open the door with deep voices and are asking for the car keys.

The "Neanderthal" Syndrome and Eternal Adolescence

The first thing that hits you isn’t the special effects; it’s the biology. Time in Hawkins moves much slower than in the real world, and the cognitive dissonance is starting to get painful.

Watching Millie Bobby Brown (Eleven) no longer evokes that protective tenderness for the little girl with the shaved head. Now she is a young woman with a powerful presence—almost giving off "responsible aunt" or "tax-paying neighbor" vibes—trapped in plotlines that she has clearly outgrown. But the most acute case of this awkward "growth spurt" is suffered by the leading men, a group we can aptly call the sentimental "Neanderthals."

The rivalry for Nancy Wheeler (Natalia Dyer) between Steve Harrington (Joe Keery) and Jonathan Byers (Charlie Heaton) has aged worse than milk left out on the counter. Specialized critics have been pointing this out for a while, but seeing it on a giant screen at Christmas makes it inescapable: Keery, who is already over thirty in real life, is still playing out high school jealousy dynamics that feel forced. They are adult actors playing "kids," with impeccable 1987 hairstyles, in a love triangle that seems frozen in time while their faces tell a very different story.

And let’s not forget those who used to be annoying and are now… well, worse. Characters like Mike Wheeler (Finn Wolfhard) have devolved from brave leaders into neurotic know-it-alls. I must confess, when the local bullies pick on him, a dark part of me feels it’s a bit of karmic justice for how irritable he has become.

Netflix and the $30 Million Machinery

While we digest our Christmas dinner, Netflix is digesting astronomical profits. Stranger Things isn't just a series; it’s the crown jewel of the platform, the asset that justifies quarterly subscriptions.

Behind this final season are, once again, the Duffer Brothers (Matt and Ross) as creators, and executive producer Shawn Levy (the same director behind blockbusters like Deadpool & Wolverine), who ensures every frame looks like cinema rather than television.

And it certainly isn't cheap. Industry reports suggest the budget for this final season is hovering around $30 million per episode. Does that money show on screen? Yes. The visual effects—whether you wonder if it’s high-end CGI or AI—are spectacular. The structured incursion into the "subsurface" (the Upside Down), where the real danger lurks, looks more terrifying and expensive than ever.

Netflix elbows its way into our Christmas with the ease of someone who knows they have the most addictive product on the market, backed by a blank check to ensure we don't change the channel.

Déjà Vu and the New Sacrifice

Despite the millions and the visual pyrotechnics, an intense sense of déjà vu pervades the room. The formulas repeat: the group splits up, the heroic adults—the ever-magnificent Winona Ryder (Joyce) and her rugged boyfriend David Harbour (Hopper)—provide emotional stability, while the youths pile into vans equipped with trackers.

The first episode closes on a familiar but effective note: the sacrifice of innocence. A new young girl seems to occupy the vulnerable space once held by Will Byers. We see her scream as the roof of her house rips open, crying out for parents who won't arrive in time.

It’s the warning that the Upside Down is no longer contained. And we, with full stomachs and a slight headache, remain hypnotized, wondering if we are truly ready for another Stranger Things marathon, or if we are simply fulfilling the ritual of saying goodbye to characters who, just like us, have aged five years in what felt like a blink of an eye.



Stranger Things









 Stranger Things 


Crónica de Navidad en Hawkins: Cuando el recalentado sabe a 'Stranger Things' y pubertad tardía



Por: Un espectador con indigestión navideña

Benjamin GAVARRE 

La escena es un cliché de temporada: 25 de diciembre, el estómago a punto de reventar por el pavo y los romeritos, y la familia tirada en el sofá en un estado de coma alimenticio. Nadie quiere discutir política, así que encendemos la televisión. Y ahí está, como un regalo que pedimos hace tres años y que llega con retraso por culpa de pandemias y huelgas de Hollywood: el inicio de la quinta y última temporada de Stranger Things.

Netflix no da puntada sin hilo. Sabe que en estas fechas somos presas fáciles de la nostalgia y el entretenimiento pasivo. Así que, entre el ponche y el postre, nos sumergimos una vez más en Hawkins. Pero el regreso a este universo se siente, de entrada, como visitar a esos sobrinos lejanos que dejaste de ver cuando usaban brackets y ahora te abren la puerta con voz grave y exigiendo las llaves del coche.

El síndrome de los "Neandertales" y la eterna adolescencia

Lo primero que salta a la vista no son los efectos especiales, sino la biología. El tiempo en Hawkins pasa más lento que en el mundo real, y la disonancia cognitiva empieza a ser dolorosa.

Ver a Millie Bobby Brown (Once) ya no genera esa ternura protectora de la niña rapada. Ahora es una mujer joven con una presencia potente, casi de "tía responsable" o vecina que paga sus impuestos, atrapada en tramas que le quedan chicas. Pero el caso más agudo de este "estirón" incómodo lo sufren los galanes, ese grupo que acertadamente podemos llamar los "neandertales" sentimentales.

La rivalidad por Nancy Wheeler (Natalia Dyer) entre Steve Harrington (Joe Keery) y Jonathan Byers (Charlie Heaton) ha envejecido peor que la leche fuera del refri. La crítica especializada lleva tiempo señalándolo, pero verlo en pantalla gigante en Navidad es ineludible: Keery, superando ya la treintena en la vida real, sigue interpretando dinámicas de celos de preparatoria que se sienten forzadas. Son actores adultos jugando a ser "chavos", con peinados impecables de 1987, en un triángulo amoroso que parece no avanzar, congelado en el tiempo mientras sus rostros cuentan otra historia.

Y no olvidemos a los que antes nos caían mal y ahora... peor. Personajes como Mike Wheeler (Finn Wolfhard) han pasado de ser líderes valientes a neuróticos sabelotodos. Confieso que cuando los "malos" de turno le hacen bullying, una parte oscura de mí siente que es un poco de justicia kármica por lo insoportable que se ha vuelto.

Netflix y la maquinaria de los 30 millones

Mientras nosotros digerimos el bacalao, Netflix digiere ganancias astronómicas. Stranger Things no es solo una serie; es la joya de la corona de la plataforma, el activo que justifica las suscripciones trimestrales.

Detrás de esta temporada final están, nuevamente, los Hermanos Duffer (Matt y Ross) como creadores, y el productor ejecutivo Shawn Levy (el mismo director de éxitos de taquilla como Deadpool & Wolverine), quien se asegura de que cada plano parezca cine y no televisión.

Y vaya que cuesta. Los reportes de la industria sugieren que el presupuesto de esta temporada final ronda los 30 millones de dólares por episodio. ¿Se nota ese dinero en pantalla? Sí. Los efectos visuales, ya sea que te preguntes si es Inteligencia Artificial o CGI de primer nivel, son espectaculares. La incursión estructurada al "subsuelo" (el Mundo del Revés), donde habita el peligro real, luce más aterradora y costosa que nunca.

Netflix se mete en nuestra Navidad con la soltura de quien sabe que tiene el producto más adictivo del mercado, financiado con un cheque en blanco para garantizar que no cambiemos de canal.

El déjà vu y el nuevo sacrificio

A pesar de los millones y la pirotecnia visual, un intenso déjà vu invade la sala. Las fórmulas se repiten: el grupo se divide, los adultos heroicos —la siempre magnífica Winona Ryder (Joyce) y su robusto novio David Harbour (Hopper)— aportan la estabilidad emocional, mientras los jóvenes se suben a camionetas con localizadores.

El primer capítulo cierra con una nota conocida pero efectiva: el sacrificio de la inocencia. Una nueva niña ocupa el lugar de vulnerabilidad que alguna vez tuvo Will Byers. La vemos gritar mientras el techo de su casa se abre, clamando por unos padres que no llegarán a tiempo.

Es el aviso de que el Mundo del Revés ya no está contenido. Y nosotros, con el estómago lleno y un ligero dolor de cabeza, nos quedamos hipnotizados, preguntándonos si estamos listos para otro maratón de Stranger Things, o si solo estamos cumpliendo con el ritual de despedir a unos personajes que, al igual que nosotros, han envejecido cinco años en lo que pareció un parpadeo.



lunes, 22 de diciembre de 2025

BOOTS review TV serie

  &































 

The Uniform of Silence: A Review of "Boots" (2025) and the Paradox of Identity


por GAVARRE Benjamin


The recent cancellation of "Boots" on Netflix is not just a matter of audiences; it is an act of cultural censorship. While classic war cinema has accustomed us to seeing war as a "forging of men", this series showed us that, in 1990, the uniform was actually a gag.


I analyze the story of Cameron Cope, the betrayal of Sergeant Sullivan, and why institutions prefer soldiers who are "killing machines" to diverse human beings.


It is not a matter of living on your knees, but of living in silence. 🕯️

#BootsNetflix #CineYCritica #MilesHeizer #TeatroYRealidad #Censura #LGBTIQ #MilitaryDrama #BenjaminGavarre


Why did the Pentagon call "Boots" "woke trash" while applauding Kubrick's violence? 🪖


The cancellation of the Netflix series reveals an uncomfortable truth: the system tolerates the horror of war, but fears the honesty of the skin. #Boots #Netflix 


In 1990, the U.S. military didn't just ask you for discipline, it asked for your identity. "Boots" is the portrait of that "gag" that the system imposed on thousands. A necessary criticism of the series that they did not want us to see. 


"Boots" ended just before Afghanistan. Cameron Cope entered the military, but had to amputate his truth to survive. Is it success or is it a defeat of the soul? We look at the phenomenon of the canceled series that rocked the Pentagon.



The Uniform of Silence: A Review of "Boots" (2025) and the Paradox of Identity


por GAVARRE Benjamin

The recent cancellation of the Netflix series "Boots", just two months after its October 2025 premiere, is not merely a financial move; it is a cultural symptom. Set in 1990, the story of Cameron Cope (played by Miles Heizer) places us on the threshold of an era of institutionalized silence. While the world often remembers the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy as progress, the series reminds us that for the soldier, this was not liberation, but a gag. It was not just about living on one's knees, but about living with a gagged soul while swearing allegiance to a flag that ignores you.

The Cast of Silence and Family Betrayal

The plot rests on the charisma of Cameron, a 17-year-old seeking the structure in the Marine Corps that his mother, Barbara Cope (Vera Farmiga), has denied him. Barbara is a fascinatingly despicable character: a materialistic woman who prefers to commodify her son’s supposed "death" for social status rather than face the reality of who he truly is.

Alongside Cameron is Sergeant Sullivan (Max Parker), the instructor burdened by the ghost of his own past at Fort Riley. Sullivan is a man haunted by his own Erinyes: he betrayed his military lover to survive within the hierarchy. When he looks at Cameron, Sullivan does not see a recruit, but his own history repeating itself. His advice to "stay quiet" is not malice, but a traumatic survival instinct.

The Paradox of Violence: Why Does the Pentagon Condemn "Boots"?

It is revealing to compare the reception of Boots with classics like Coppola's Apocalypse Now or Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. In those works, the violence is extreme and the systemic critique is fierce, yet the Pentagon often tolerates them because cruelty is viewed as a byproduct of warrior "toughness."

However, when a series based on Greg Cope White’s real-life memoirs introduces sexual identity, the institution reacts with hostility. For the high command, it is acceptable to show a soldier turning into a killing machine, but it is "unacceptable" to show him as a diverse human being. The "woke garbage" label that the Pentagon slapped on the series is a defense mechanism to prevent the myth of monolithic masculinity from crumbling. They prefer the horror of war over the honesty of the skin.

Conclusion

The series ends with the company preparing for the Gulf conflict. Cameron’s "success" is bittersweet: he has made it into the military, but at the cost of amputating his truth. The gag has triumphed. Boots leaves a bitter taste not because of its quality, but because of its truth: it shows us that even under the uniform of freedom, silence remains the strictest order.